Mastering Investigative Interviewing: Techniques Inspired by Wicklander-Zulawski (WZ)

As a career investigator, investigative interviewing was one of the early skills I picked up. I knew it was important and a skill to attempt to master. As a Certified Forensic Interviewer, investigative interviewing is a cornerstone of fact-finding in law enforcement, human resources, and corporate security. Among the most respected frameworks for conducting these interviews is the Wicklander-Zulawski (WZ) method—a suite of evidence-based, non-confrontational techniques designed to elicit truthful, actionable information while preserving the integrity and dignity of all involved. This article explores the core principles, strategies, and practical applications of investigative interviewing as taught by WZ, offering a comprehensive guide for professionals seeking to refine their approach.

Why Investigative Interviewing Matters

At its heart, investigative interviewing is about more than just gathering information—it's about uncovering the truth in a way that is ethical, effective, and legally sound. The quality of an interview can determine the outcome of an investigation, influence organizational decisions, and even affect lives and reputations. WZ’s approach stands out for its focus on rapport, empathy, and adaptability, making it a gold standard for professionals in the field.

Core Principles of the WZ Method

1. Non-Confrontational Approach

Unlike traditional interrogation methods that may rely on confrontation or accusation, WZ emphasizes a conversational, non-accusatory style. This reduces resistance, minimizes the risk of false confessions, and encourages subjects to share information willingly.

2. Rapport Building

Establishing rapport is the foundation of every successful interview. WZ teaches that building trust and a sense of mutual respect sets the stage for open communication. Interviewers are trained to use empathy, active listening, and genuine interest to connect with the subject, regardless of their role in the investigation.

3. Flexibility and Adaptation

Every interview is unique. WZ-trained professionals learn to adapt their strategies based on the evidence at hand, the subject’s demeanor, and the type of case. This flexibility ensures that the interviewer can pivot as needed, employing the most effective techniques for each situation.

4. Evidence-Based Techniques

WZ’s methods are grounded in research and real-world application. Interviewers are taught to use evidence strategically—not as a tool for confrontation, but to guide the conversation and assess the credibility of responses.

---

The Investigative Interview Process: Step by Step

1. Preparation

• Review the Case: Gather all available information and evidence before the interview.
• Set Objectives: Define what you need to learn from the interview.
• Plan the Environment: Choose a neutral, comfortable setting to put the subject at ease.

2. Opening the Interview

• Introduce Yourself and Your Role: Clearly explain your purpose and the scope of the interview.
• Establish Ground Rules: Set expectations for the conversation, emphasizing confidentiality and respect.
• Build Rapport: Engage in small talk, show empathy, and demonstrate genuine interest in the subject’s perspective.

3. Information Gathering

• Ask Open-Ended Questions: Encourage the subject to share their story in their own words. Avoid leading or accusatory questions.
• Listen Actively: Allow the subject to do most of the talking—ideally 75% of the conversation.
• Observe Behavior: Pay attention to verbal and non-verbal cues, but avoid jumping to conclusions based solely on body language.

4. Assessing Credibility

• Compare Statements to Evidence: Gently introduce facts or inconsistencies to gauge reactions.
• Use Strategic Empathy: Show understanding for the subject’s situation without condoning wrongdoing. This can lower defenses and encourage honesty.
• Handle Resistance: If the subject becomes defensive or evasive, use rapport and empathy to keep the conversation productive.

5. Developing Details

• Clarify and Probe: Ask follow-up questions to fill in gaps or clarify ambiguities.
• Summarize and Reflect: Periodically restate what you’ve heard to confirm understanding and encourage further elaboration.

6. Closing the Interview

• Thank the Subject: Express appreciation for their time and cooperation.
• Explain Next Steps: Let the subject know what will happen next in the process.
• Document the Interview: Record key statements, observations, and any admissions or denials for the investigative record.

Key Techniques Taught by WZ

Participatory Interview Method

This method involves engaging the subject in a collaborative conversation, allowing them to participate in the fact-finding process. The interviewer uses empathy statements and logical reasoning to guide the discussion, making it less adversarial and more productive.

Empathy Statements

WZ teaches interviewers to craft empathy statements that acknowledge the subject’s feelings or circumstances without excusing misconduct. This helps preserve rapport and encourages openness.

Strategic Use of Evidence

Rather than confronting the subject with evidence, WZ-trained interviewers introduce facts gradually and in context. This allows the subject to explain discrepancies and reduces the likelihood of defensive reactions.

Handling Resistance

When a subject resists, WZ methods focus on understanding the source of resistance and addressing it through rapport, empathy, and reframing questions. The goal is to keep the conversation moving forward without escalating conflict.

Avoiding False Confessions

One of the most significant advantages of WZ’s non-confrontational approach is its ability to prevent false confessions. By focusing on information development rather than confession-seeking, and by avoiding coercive tactics, WZ-trained interviewers create an environment where subjects feel safe to tell the truth.

Practical Applications: Real-World Scenarios

Law Enforcement

Police officers and detectives use WZ techniques to interview witnesses, victims, and suspects in a wide range of cases—from theft to homicide. The methods help law enforcement professionals obtain reliable information while respecting the rights of all parties.

Human Resources and Corporate Investigations

HR professionals investigating workplace misconduct, discrimination, or harassment benefit from WZ’s rapport-based strategies. The approach is especially effective in sensitive cases where trust and confidentiality are paramount.

Loss Prevention and Security

Retail and corporate security teams use WZ methods to investigate theft, fraud, and other integrity issues. The non-confrontational style reduces the risk of legal challenges and helps organizations resolve cases more efficiently.

Training and Continuous Improvement

WZ offers a range of training programs, from foundational seminars to advanced workshops. These courses combine theory with practical exercises, including video analysis of real interviews and role-playing scenarios. Continuous education ensures that professionals stay current with the latest research and best practices.

Conclusion: The WZ Advantage

The Wicklander-Zulawski approach to investigative interviewing represents a paradigm shift from confrontational, confession-driven tactics to a more ethical, effective, and adaptable model. By prioritizing rapport, empathy, and evidence-based strategies, WZ-trained professionals are better equipped to uncover the truth, protect the rights of all parties, and avoid the pitfalls of false confessions.

Whether you are a law enforcement officer, HR professional, or corporate investigator, mastering these techniques can elevate your practice, improve outcomes, and build trust within your organization and community. As investigative interviewing continues to evolve, WZ remains at the forefront, setting the standard for professionalism and integrity in the field. Find them online at w-z.com.